lordfinbar 2009-07-08 ★☆☆☆☆ (1.0/5.0) (4 votes) To use his ability just once costs a total of 6 mana and does at most 2 points of damage. I can see some value in sealed deck but beyond that he's pretty subpar.
Talcos 2010-11-13 ★★☆☆☆ (2.9/5.0) (4 votes) @ 001010011100101110: How is this card in any way similar to Magmaw in terms of functionality other than the fact that they do damage?
Sironos 2010-12-16 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.8/5.0) (2 votes) Water under the bridge, an experimental forefather of ping, not useful by today's standards, like a classic car compared to modern cards.
Atali 2011-02-20 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes) Certainly not a forefather to ping, Prodigal Sorcerer is the forefather to ping.This is simply awful by any standard, only useful if there is absolutely no other ping in the format.
blindthrall 2012-07-14 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Way to conservatively costed. Take out the tap effect, then we have a decent card.
Comments (7)
*shrugs*
This is simply awful by any standard, only useful if there is absolutely no other ping in the format.