Should have something like "draw a card for each creature put into a graveyard from play this way". And be instant, and cost less...
windsorwindsor1
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(3 votes)
Hmm... Maybe if I wanted to hose a Rabid Wombat deck...
Volcre
★☆☆☆☆ (1.5/5.0)(3 votes)
This is a rare?
Mode
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Too expensive for a far too specific effect. Even then, i'd splash red and play Aura Barbs instead if i was going to play against an aura-based deck. Although a simple Tranquility would still be more advisable against regular enchantment decks.
Gilgiga
★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Why can't this kill Uril
JFM2796
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(2 votes)
It is not even funny how terrible Homelands is.
axiobeta
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(3 votes)
Some cards are on the reserved list just because they're retarded
Goatllama
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
The original text has an alarming number of uses of the word creature (creature creature).
Arachnos
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I like the art.
It's the only thing I like about it.
Kirbster
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
It would have been interesting and permissible, but still not useful, at one-quarter the mana cost. As is... it's just bad.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Okay, first of all, most auras give some kind of P/T booster, negating the relevance of this card. Second of all its overpriced. So its incredibly narrow and is not likely to do its job when the conditions are met.
Comments (13)
Even then, i'd splash red and play Aura Barbs instead if i was going to play against an aura-based deck. Although a simple Tranquility would still be more advisable against regular enchantment decks.
It's the only thing I like about it.
.5/5
Ragged Veins, Binding Agony, Spiteful Shadows
Two of em on there & it's 8 damage. Three makes it 18.
.5/5
@BaasHaag
Oh wow. I never thought about that. Never mind.
2.5/5