RafiqTheMiststalker 2010-04-19 ★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0) (2 votes) Come now. A creature with CMC equal to its p/t is never that bad. A creature with CMC equal to its p/t with cheap options is good.3 1/2 at the least.
achilleselbow 2010-04-20 ★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (2 votes) Yea, it's not bad. Ebony Treefolk from the same set, with a similar casting cost and base p/t is better though, I think.
HairlessThoctar 2010-05-13 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes) It's not that bad, but it's not very rare worthy either.
Kirbster 2010-07-05 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (7 votes) Pretty darn efficient for the day, but I think they could have gotten away with static First Strike.
Baconradar 2011-10-05 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote) Great for a casual cat deck. Good power for its time period. Before creature creep this was a 4/5 so imo it still is.
Kryptnyt 2011-12-02 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Just look at Blade Splicer! One could say it is a bit more efficient.
Lord_Ascapelion 2013-01-13 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) This was disturbingly efficient back in the day. Nowadays, you'd just see this with just First Strike as an uncommon.
Comments (11)
A creature with CMC equal to its p/t is never that bad.
A creature with CMC equal to its p/t with cheap options is good.
3 1/2 at the least.
Good power for its time period.
Before creature creep this was a 4/5 so imo it still is.