Great card as it is really 2 cards in one, making it massively flexible. Very effective for red/white decks, 4 out of 5.
Fagulheiro
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I just like how it comes turn 3, after a turn 1 lackey and a turn 2 warren instigator
Gabriel422
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(2 votes)
I just want that Chaos half back as a core set staple.
Opined_Fluke
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
@Gabriel422 You know that's an interesting thought - reprints of one side of these split cards o.o
MacBizzle
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Just knowing I have 4 copies of Order in my R/W double strike deck will keep peoples' best creatures off of my back when I have {3}{W} available.
Not to mention, Chaos is a good finisher.
Mode
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
"I just want that Chaos half back as a core set staple."
@Gabriel422 Reprints of just one half of split cards seem like a nice idea.
Some split cards get only played for one half anyways while the other half could usually not even be played (unless it's made possible through the opponent, e.g. with an Utopia Vow.)
I'm not sure though if the current split card ruling would be sufficient to cover up the possibility to have a card that's both available as regular card and as one half of a split card. This would probably require a paragraph that states that you can't have four times this split card as well as the "singleton version" of it in your deck. Then again it almost seems like the rules already cover that, maybe Wizards even had the possibility of single split card reprints in mind already when they created them:
708.7. If an effect instructs a player to name a card and the player wants to name a split card, the player must name both halves of the split card. An object has the chosen name if it has at least one of the two names chosen this way.
I wonder if they'll maybe even print two mediocre cards as one split card someday...
Of course it would probably be a lot easier to just get a functional reprint of the Chaos half, since it would indeed make a great Core Set staple :D
TheWrathofShane
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Order is sub par, while chaos is perfect. If they took out the restriction with order then this would be fantastic. But you cant complain when its instant speed exile removal, even with a restriction at .
Comments (8)
Good card. What more can I say?
Chaos
Great card for that last minute finish.
3.5
You know that's an interesting thought - reprints of one side of these split cards o.o
Not to mention, Chaos is a good finisher.
@Gabriel422 Reprints of just one half of split cards seem like a nice idea.
Some split cards get only played for one half anyways while the other half could usually not even be played (unless it's made possible through the opponent, e.g. with an Utopia Vow.)
I'm not sure though if the current split card ruling would be sufficient to cover up the possibility to have a card that's both available as regular card and as one half of a split card.
This would probably require a paragraph that states that you can't have four times this split card as well as the "singleton version" of it in your deck.
Then again it almost seems like the rules already cover that, maybe Wizards even had the possibility of single split card reprints in mind already when they created them:
708.7. If an effect instructs a player to name a card and the player wants to name a split card, the player must name both halves of the split card. An object has the chosen name if it has at least one of the two names chosen this way.
I wonder if they'll maybe even print two mediocre cards as one split card someday...
Of course it would probably be a lot easier to just get a functional reprint of the Chaos half, since it would indeed make a great Core Set staple :D
But you cant complain when its instant speed exile removal, even with a restriction at