A common vanilla Legendary? thats not that good anyway?
Arthindole
★★★☆☆ (3.4/5.0)(4 votes)
I wanna play this guy in a deck soo bad, just for laughs. Cuz if you can win a game with this guy, you have earned the right to yell 'WAR BEARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in their faces :")
Creyn
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0)(2 votes)
The best use I can see in this is his warrior subtype. Other than that he's pretty old school fail
Come on, he should get a 5/5 just for that name alone.
MagicMTG
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(5 votes)
WAAAAARBEARD!
Kirbster
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(15 votes)
With a name like that, you just know he's the frontman for a Gaelic speed metal band.
Sironos
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0)(2 votes)
OMG I love this card! The epic flavour that has nothing to do with a 6/5 vanilla, not much cunning about that. This, combined with an absurd multicoloured mana cost and an art that looks like a sketch, even by the standard of those days, it's so hilariously epic fail :D
Dr.Pingas
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
a 6/5 in with no drawback(bar casting cost, which was always high for back then) WAS pretty cunning, in those days >.<
Comments (20)
Stay stark raving mad, my friends.
..................
..........
...................
THE P/T =/= CMC... IT SHOULD BE > NOOBS!
FAILURE!
BAN HAMMER! TO THE R&D TEAM!
.5/5
Does "appearance" have some archaic meaning I might not know? Because I don't see how his appearance is either devious or cunning.
Well yeah if you have bark for teeth you're going to bite as well as you bark. It's practically tautological.