Play in creature-heavy decks, otherwise you could lose your winning card.
Jokergius
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(2 votes)
I was about to say Reinforcements...but that's just too much...
Donovan_Fabian
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(2 votes)
So, it costs 4 only checks 3 cards and if only 1 of those are a creature the rest goes to your graveyard. Seems like a distinctly weaker gift of the gargantuan. On a side note, seems like there are dinosaurs in that picture.. when are we going to get some dinosaur creatures? That would be cool.
ChaoticDarkness
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(8 votes)
Harmonize swaps one colorless for a green mana, and in return doesn't make you show the cards and you get to keep them all. That's a trade well worth it in Harmonize's favor, even in multi-color.
HairlessThoctar
★☆☆☆☆ (1.3/5.0)(3 votes)
Severely underrated.
The matter of fact is; you're not going to be putting this in a low-creature count deck so this can be as good as Harmonize most of the time.
nammertime
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(2 votes)
Play with Congregation at Dawn. Not that having both in your deck would make it a good deck, but it could be fun. Magic is a game, isn't it?
Haze01
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
I also prefer Gift of the Gargantuan. As for the issue of dinosaurs, I think an official had brought up the point that, despite the image in Beast Hunt, the plane of Zendikar won't feature those large lizards. It also hurts that dinosaur is no longer a supported creature type, as shown by Pygmy Allosaurus.
ddde
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(3 votes)
@HairlessThoctar: Really? As good as Harmonize most of the time? For it to be as good as harmonize you would have to be able to draw three cards with it. For it to do that most of the time that would mean that, on average, you would have to draw more then 2.5 cards with it. For you to be drawing 2.5 cards with it, on average, out of 3 cards looked at, 2.5 would have to be creatures, which means 5/6 of your deck would have to be creatures. This means a typical 60 card deck would have to have 50 creatures, leaving only 10 slots for lands, instants, sorceries, enchantments, artifacts, and planeswalkers. Even if you had nothing else but lands 10 lands seems way too low for a 60 card deck. So unless you have some other tricks up your sleeve, just playing this in a creature heavy deck will not make it as good as harmonize most of the time.
304
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Saw someone use this to decent effect in a WGU allies deck. Even if it doesn't hit any creatures it'll mill you for cards that you don't want late-game (lands and non-ally spells); I still don't know why he ran it over Foresee.
Am I the only one that thinks this card is a misprint... it should cost only or be a instant, or keep its mana cost but let you pick one non-creature card as well.
Gako
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Its like Ancestral Recall except instead of drawing three you throw your crappy deck at the wall and storm off.
lorendorky
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
You could use this in some sort of mono-green creaturless flashback deck to mill yourself :P
Gear61
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Pretty much completely obsoleted by Lead the Stampede. As much as I love card advantage in green, this card just doesn't cut it.
Sliver_Legion
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
"Hurda" is the worst word ever.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Well this puts creatures in your graveyard, lead the stampede does not. Lead the stampede is much better, digs deeper and lower mana cost.
RDorothy
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
what a shame... such beautiful artwork for such a sucky card. 2 stars for the art
Comments (22)
The matter of fact is; you're not going to be putting this in a low-creature count deck so this can be as good as Harmonize most of the time.
Lead the stampede is much better, digs deeper and lower mana cost.
such beautiful artwork for such a sucky card.
2 stars for the art