Enchanted Being

mrredhatter 2009-10-02

★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0) (4 votes)

MTG please make her a Cleric or a Shaman or a Wizard or something other than plain old Human.

Guest57443454 2009-11-25

★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0) (4 votes)

I think she would be a Shaman myself, but it could be any of those classes...

Interesting creature however, but Auras aren't common enough to make her worthwhile...

EternalLurker 2010-02-14

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (7 votes)

"Summon BEING"? Really? Really? >_<

A3Kitsune 2010-03-13

★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (3 votes)

I'd go with Druid, because that class has a long history of having female Humans with abilities that key off of enchantments.

tavaritz 2011-05-11

★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (3 votes)

Goes well in an enchatress deck where you only have auras for the opponent.

FiveEight 2011-10-25

★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (2 votes)

O HAY

YOU CAN PACIFISM THEIR CREATURES

AND THEN BLOCK THEM WITH HER

GENIUS

ChrisKool 2012-03-10

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

While the ability is fairly lackluster, where Enchanted Being fails in design, it excels in flavor!

Gargantula 2012-06-05

★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (3 votes)

I would love to block a big nasty Uril, the Miststalker with her.

longwinded 2012-10-13

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

The change from "Summon Being" to "Creature -- Human" kind of makes sense. Back then, humans usually got a class type, and non-human creatures got a race type. So if you think of "being" as a class and not a race, that pretty much means that that the race was always implicitly human. That's kind of supported by the very human art as well. It's also pretty difficult to think of any modern "class" of which "being" is clearly a special case.

TheWrathofShane 2013-07-10

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Most auras give some form of evasion. Also the best way to deal with auras is 2 for 1 with removal.

Comments (10)