Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Uktabi Wildcats

Multiverse ID: 14721

Uktabi Wildcats

Comments (9)

A3Kitsune
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Cat Warrior? How are these guys warriors?
pumaman83
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (5 votes)
Uktabi Wildcats - Sounds like a good name for a Dominaria football team.
Treima
★★★★☆ (4.7/5.0) (3 votes)
A3kitsune, they're not anymore. Errata removed the Warrior creature type.
Kryptnyt
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (5 votes)
the fact that warrior is even there is hilarious, nothing at all in any printings of the card infers that they are warriors.
tcollins
★★★★☆ (4.7/5.0) (3 votes)
I really wish that regeneration clause didn't require sacrificing a land...not only does it slow you down, it also reduces the power and toughness of your Uktabi Wildcats
Paolino
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Cat Warrior was a great creature type, but a warrior sounds like a trained fighter while these are wild beasts...
pokebulborb
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
http://warriorcatzgurl.webs.com/photos/Warriors%20Book%20Covers/A%20Dangerous%20Path%20cover.jpg
Why yes A3Kitsune, yes they are!
Jannissary
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Inelegant card design, in my opinion.

Putting a card like this at such a steep mana cost means that they're not coming out particularly quick, and when they do come out, they're really nothing special. You can't even use non-land acceleration (Llanowar Elves et al.) to speed it up, because you'll get a weaker cat.

And you have to pay mana and sacrifice to regenerate? I don't think I'd have played this in Limited, either, and none of the casual decks I saw when 6th Edition was fresh ever played it.
acolyte_of_night
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I know people are dissing on the forest sacrifice, but I think its great top-down design. This creature is not just one cat - it's whole pack. If it gets hit by a fireball, one of the cats 'sacrifices' itself for the pack, making it survive the ball of fire.