Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Facevaulter

Multiverse ID: 142361

Facevaulter

Comments (10)

nubiop
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (3 votes)
it would be a much better sacrifice outlet if not for the swamp activate cost plus the goblin restriction, once again wizards trying too hard to make a 'fixed card'
Facevaulterrules234
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0) (5 votes)
Nubiop, you have no idea. Facevaulter ROCKS! I play this card and my opponents give up. They don't want to experience the raw power af the FACEVAULTER!!!!!!!!
Oleander
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (3 votes)
This goblin would be pretty broken without the swamp cost and without the goblin sacrifice requirement. It'd be a 1 cost Nantuko Husk, and besides, if you're running him in a goblin deck, the ability to easily nuke goblins breaks the game, especially with Boggart Shenanigans in play.
channelblaze
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (3 votes)
Facevaulter is really cool, and my favorite combo ever, goatnapper+facevaulter, stealing a chameleon colossus. You gotta admit, that would be pretty awesome.
Radagast
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0) (1 vote)
The name alone makes this card epic!
Paolino
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
This card would be very good if only Abyssal Persecutor were a goblin...
However, it's still not bad.
Goatllama
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
They meant "+2/+2 and FLYING"
Also, that guy in the lower left corner has an absolutely amazing expression on his face. Or maybe that's a footprint.
MRK1
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Shoulda been +2/+2 and flying.
Jerec_Onyx
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Used with Goblin Arsonist, this is beautiful.
HuntingDrake
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Goblin-only Bloodthrone Vampire, costing 1 less to cast but Black more to activate.