Pointed Discussion

majinara 2009-10-25

★☆☆☆☆ (1.5/5.0) (5 votes)

Turn it into a zombie or horror, allow it to sac itself without tapping, and it would be playable. The way it is here? 1/5

Wraique 2010-04-06

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

I guess it was a little better when you could throw things onto the stack after combat damage? You could do that back in Urza's right?

McThor 2010-04-30

★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (4 votes)

Look at that poor little bird...

HairlessThoctar 2011-02-09

★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (5 votes)

Fume Spitter

Ferlord 2011-05-15

★☆☆☆☆ (1.0/5.0) (1 vote)

This whole set of "sacrifice. give *-/*- to target creature for a turn" creatures in this set are extremely inefficient. Why don't you just block an attacking creature? it'll give the same effect.

BastianQoU 2011-06-29

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

@Ferlord:
because back in the day, you could block, then sac for extra damage. this card could take out a */2 on it's own. as it is today, it can take out a */1 flying/unblockable/shadow/anything with evasion and without shroud.

BegleOne 2011-08-09

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

That Phyrexian is lucky that bird isn't a Whippoorwill.

car2n 2014-03-26

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Kookaburra sits in a Phyrexian's hand
Former merry king of a far away land.
Stop, kookaburra stop, kookaburra
You're a part of Yawgmoth's great plan.