why is this rated so low? You will almost always have a 3/2 dude on your turn to attack, beginning turn 3. That's solid. And your opponent will be completely unable to remove the creature through sorcery-speed removal. It's not kickass awesome, but it's nothing to sneeze at either.
EvilCleavage
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(4 votes)
Actually man, you'll have a 3/2 to block with. Try rereading it one more time.
Exuberance
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(4 votes)
Actually, man, you attack and play the land second main phase. Try thinking outside the box.
Paleopaladin
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(1 vote)
LOL Exuberance! Sorry EvilCleavage, but his aping of you to make the counterpoint was funny.
...but the card doesn't "come into play" every time it turns into a beast. It was already in play, it's just a creature now. So the Savage; she does nothing.
djflo
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Actually, your opponent can definitely remove it with sorceries - they just play a land. Now, if you have some way of bringing a land down at instant speed, say a fetchland, you can thwart them which is kinda cool.
I don't think this is a great card, but it's very interesting and flavourful, I'd like to see more of these change and change back cards.
Comments (8)
Anyhow, I could see this being solid with Wirewood Savage.
I don't think this is a great card, but it's very interesting and flavourful, I'd like to see more of these change and change back cards.
They bounce lands thus ensuring that you have a creature. This guy doesn't bounce lands as he's not a creature.