A 4/4 for 5 is average. Its ability is far below average. Aside from combat tricks with Vigilance...no, its still a bad card. Even if you didn't have to sacrifice a forest to use its ability, its a bad card. It can't even target creatures. Why its a rare is beyond me.
Qazior
★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0)(5 votes)
C'mon it's green permanent burn
GradiustheFox
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(6 votes)
I'd play it just for the joy of being able to say I'm throwing a forest at my opponent. You just can't do that with Fling, no matter how strategically superior it is to this one.
TDL
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
This is a bad card, and yet so cool at the same time. I would definitely run it in a casual green/red swing and fling deck for the lulz.
Sironos
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Cool flavour, cool idea, bad card. Why cann't a giant throw a tree at a creature?
BloodMoon1987
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
has no one heard of grounds keeper itll keep him going forever
DoragonShinzui
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
The flavor text made me giggle, and at least it's not a horrendous card.
Lord_Ascapelion
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Weird card with a red ability that's not that great... but hilarious flavor text.
Comments (9)