Titanic Bulvox

N84M09 2009-08-05

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (5 votes)

yeah...the morph cost on this makes it kinda pointless eh...makes more sense to just replace it with a Scaled Wurm

GreatWulf 2010-04-13

★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (2 votes)

try using it with some Krosan Drovers. i have four of these, with 4 Krosan Drovers. for 2 green mana their a peach.

Ava_Adore 2010-06-06

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

now morphing cards are the bomb, ya stick em in a deck with cards that remove and return a creature, you can get any morgh card out with 4-5 mana now (that includes playing the 3 to play it face down) only problem is ya dont get the face up effect on them

Zulp 2010-10-07

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

When I first started playing the game, I had a few of these and thought they were the coolest ever, because the art was sweet and they were so big. I really didn't understand that a 7/4 for 8 was never worth it. New players will think the craziest things sometimes.

MasterOfEtherium 2011-01-15

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (4 votes)

I'm With Zulp Right When I Started I Loooked At The Art Than That 7. And i was thinking this was one of the best cards.

kiseki 2011-10-14

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Play it morphed, then astral slide it, or flickerwisp it.
You know, if you already have an Akroma, Angel of Fury and four Imperial Hellkites and you want a few more morph creatures to cheat face up.
Yeah, the absolute nicest thing you can say about this is that it is the third best morph creature to flicker.

face-fister 2012-01-10

★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0) (2 votes)

Ofcourse it seems truely useless...
but alas, morph makes just about anything playable.
That's just how cool morph is.

fibonacci112358 2012-01-14

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)

This was one of the big creatures that I saw when I started playing Magic, and thought "Wow! That's so awesome, I wish I had that card!"

Now I realise how totally awful it truly is.

TheArchive 2013-01-17

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

What's the difference between a Bulvox and a Baloth? We may never know.

Comments (9)