Tanaka348 2010-08-02 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes) Sure, it's a finisher effect, so it's not going to be just 2R or something, but 6R is still asking too much.
ClockworkSwordfish 2010-11-17 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (3 votes) Oh yeah, people actually had beast decks back then.
supershawn 2011-03-05 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) should be alot less mana to hardcast it since it just turns up as a 3/4 that way.also I think there's a card that flips morphed creatures face up...
NoobOfLore 2011-03-05 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Both the morph and the regular cast are too much. would have been a good hard-cast, and the morph would have gone well at about... perhaps?It's just a little bit too expensive, as-is.
blurrymadness 2013-04-09 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Not bad with any of the guys who turn up a face-down creature. Super mediocre without one.
Comments (6)
also I think there's a card that flips morphed creatures face up...
It's just a little bit too expensive, as-is.