Technically, you are incorrect as it has tribal interactions with snakes. Still crap, though.
agalloch
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(3 votes)
Actually, a lot of cards are strictly better (ignoring tribals...who the hell would throw this in a snake deck?). Even Rats of Rath. Bad card.
boneclub
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(3 votes)
This isn't a great card, but the idea is pretty badass ;)
Test-Subject_217601
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(5 votes)
Screw whether it's good or not. It's friggin' cool!
JL_Weber
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(2 votes)
@nubiop No, Sickle Ripper is not strictly better. Strictly means in all cases a card is better. If you were playing against a Warrior-Tribal deck with Coat of Arms, Sickle Ripper would not be better if you wanted to keep your opponents creatures with in a certain toughness range for burn and the lot. However I do agree with you that Sickle Ripper is better in 99,999/100,000 cases.
Comments (8)
@Test-Subject_217601 YES