Very flavorful card, but needlessly complicated...
holgir
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(6 votes)
Don't try to read the rules text when you're drunk.
FragNutMK1
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0)(2 votes)
They should rename it "Sneuter"
SonOfSamus
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Basically, if my lands are snow covered, you attack me with a creature this enchants and your creature could possibly be reduced to becoming a 0/1. Not too shabby vs. powerful aggressive creatures. On your turn it possibly won't have any effect unless you're playing with snow covered lands
bluewiz7
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I have no idea what this card does.
desolation_masticore
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Man old cards were clunky, couldn't this just say destroy target creature or something? I mean Desert Twister was in green's color pie in the day.
jonb86
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(2 votes)
the "attacking" part is what makes this card really silly all around. Awful card; one of the worst cards I have ever seen.
Chaka-K-Rock
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
I get dizzy just looking at it.
Kryptnyt
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
"It's cold... and there are wolves after me!"
Lord_Ascapelion
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(1 vote)
Wow, this card is awful. It breaks so many design rules it's not even funny- green getting -X/-X effects is out of color, it's ludicrously complicated for a small effect and it uses Snow Lands, which was a pretty terrible mechanic.
BongRipper420
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I don't understand this.
Lifegainwithbite
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Wait... what? What did I just read?
LordRandomness
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Good in multiplayer snow decks, since an enchanted creature will still want to attack, just not you.
Comments (16)