Ruthless Invasion

PhyrexianFailure 2011-04-28

★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0) (3 votes)

This in green black infect. cool.

Kryplixx 2011-04-29

★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0) (3 votes)

With the right setup - this is amazing for only 3.

guitargamer79 2011-04-30

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)

Infect deck game winner for any color.......

EvilCartographer 2011-05-05

★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (2 votes)

Sort of a less effective Sleep for non-Blue. Definitely worth a try since I tend to play Artifact-only.

mimitchi86 2011-05-17

★☆☆☆☆ (1.5/5.0) (1 vote)

It all depends on your opponent's deck, but this definitely has its places. It's certainly won me a few games that I would've lost otherwise.

Vanisher65 2011-05-28

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)

Sooo underrated IN CONSTRUCTED

DeathDark 2011-06-26

★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0) (1 vote)

With a rage-extractor deck, you open your opponent up and deal 4 damage.

Otherwise, slip this into an artifact deck anywhere.

creepycrawler 2011-07-24

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Why is that molten monstrosity in front not a card? Anyway, bust up all their artifacts and go in for the kill with your Slag Fiend s and what have you.

Axelle 2011-08-02

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (6 votes)

The invasion is particularly ruthless. Tests have shown that the Phyrexians have no 'ruth' whatsoever.

eddned 2011-10-27

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Against a non-artifact deck, this is awsome
Phyrexian Rebirth

NeoKoda 2012-01-28

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)

Axelle, you've reached a level of hilarity I previously thought only Kryptnypt could achieve.

lorddarktoothx 2012-05-14

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

so ... if you play this and your opponent has no artifact creature ... you deal direct damage to your opponent (assuming all attacks go through)?

cuz that sounds pretty strong and amazing for an infect deck.

gideon999 2013-07-11

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

I have got this in every New Phyrexia booster pack I've ever got.

BlakeHN 2013-12-03

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

"Ruth" as a name is not very terror-inspiring for a phyrexian, so I can understand why they asked her to sit this one out...

Comments (14)