Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Angelfire Crusader

Multiverse ID: 21253

Angelfire Crusader

Comments (10)

Weretarrasque
★☆☆☆☆ (1.5/5.0) (1 vote)
Bleck. Don't bother.
mrredhatter
★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0) (3 votes)
Run with "Sunglases of Urza". (Sorry if I spell Sunglases right it's considered a swear word.)
http://beta.gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=2070
cats_and_me
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Nice artwork, but compare with Sunhome Enforcer..
KnightLord77
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Phenomenal artwork! But the card is just too darn expensive. 2W would be a much more balanced cost.
BegleOne
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
It's now the only non-changeling Soldier Knight in the game.


Still not useful for much, but it has a niche.
igniteice
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Such beautiful artwork deserves a better card. Very interesting that it is the only Soldier + Knight, thanks BegleOne. If only that meant it was playable...
DarthParallax
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
It's a Soldier Knight. Surely that must be relevant for lots of interesting things :)

Knight Exemplar + Ranger of Eos? Knight-Captain of Eos? Reveillark?
Arachnos
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0) (1 vote)
You know what burns hotter than the flames of holy rage? This card when I throw it into the a bonfire.
Glunders
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
The companion to Geocities Templar.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
2/3 for 3White, terrible efficiency.
Firebreathing is not so good on a white card.