allmighty_abacus 2010-07-14 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (6 votes) The layout for the vanguard cards always looked a little amateurish to me.
Kirbster 2010-09-06 ★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (6 votes) I was relieved to find out by "+3" they actually meant "+30." Oh wait, it's still bad.
TDL 2010-11-12 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes) Oh, wow. I was about ready to gouge out my eyes before I saw that that +3 is supposed to be a +30. Not too bad for a creatureless deck, I suppose.
McThor 2010-11-17 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes) I thought this card was terrible.And then I rediscovered the classic channel + any red "x" burn spellTurn One: MountainLife Total 50Turn Two: ForestLife Total: 49Turn Three: ForestLife Total: 47ChannelBanefire for <47Win
metalevolence 2011-02-01 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) This is just bizarre. Not sure if making this was a good idea.
Keino 2011-03-01 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Looks like the creature from the twilight zone movie... "There's a man on the wing!!!"
NeoKoda 2011-06-24 ★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0) (1 vote) When I saw the three, I cried. When I saw it should have been thirty...I still cried, but a little less.
NuckChorris 2013-07-03 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Funny, there is also a Yugioh card by the same name that is also extremely crappy
CogMonocle 2013-08-20 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) @ allmighty_abacusWell they were never printed, and cards on MTGO don't look nearly as good as the real thing.
Comments (10)
Oh wait, it's still bad.
And then I rediscovered the classic channel + any red "x" burn spell
Turn One: Mountain
Life Total 50
Turn Two: Forest
Life Total: 49
Turn Three: Forest
Life Total: 47
Channel
Banefire for <47
Win
"There's a man on the wing!!!"
Well they were never printed, and cards on MTGO don't look nearly as good as the real thing.