2/3 for 3 in most limited decks. This won't dominate, but it's a solid support card.
Atrues
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(5 votes)
At best, AT BEST, your looking at a 2/5 flying for 2W, but the conditions for that are stupid, find a better flyer.
Anubisx3000
★★★☆☆ (3.1/5.0)(4 votes)
Ugh. Cards dependent on "# of basic land cards..." Definitely not a fan.
thaviel
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(3 votes)
domain was fun in casual but even for domain cards this was kinda lame.
Imperialstonedragon
★★★☆☆ (3.7/5.0)(3 votes)
never saw any good domain decks, but anticipate that they run other cards, also any card that doesn't dominate is not good enough after you reach a certain level...
Fert12334
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0)(1 vote)
I would have liked the domain to effect its power instead of its toughness. or for it to have vigilance so the toughness is more effective.
This really seems underpowered for its cost and the fact that it has restrictive uses.
2/5
NoobOfLore
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(1 vote)
This card does not make me proud to be running domain.
JFM2796
★☆☆☆☆ (1.0/5.0)(2 votes)
I think it is nice how Wizards took a mechanic that was loved from Invasion Block and brought it back in Conflux and made everyone hate it for its unplayability.
gman92
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Bird holding a weapon. Kind of reminds me of Squadron Hawks.
Ameisenmeister
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Okay, the card is not a bomb, that's for sure but look at that flavor text. I really enjoyed reading the Alara-flavor texts and seeing how each shard reacts to the new "strange" worlds they encountered.
ttt3142
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This is good limited card though. It will usually be better than Wind Drake (or Wild Griffin, really), and it can also be a pretty tough blocker.
Comments (11)
or for it to have vigilance so the toughness is more effective.
This really seems underpowered for its cost and the fact that it has restrictive uses.
2/5