Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Carnivorous Plant

Multiverse ID: 1765

Carnivorous Plant

Comments (11)

Vektor480
★☆☆☆☆ (1.8/5.0) (7 votes)
4 mana for a 4/5 is not that bad, and Muraganda Petroglyphs works on it too.
Guest57443454
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
It actually doesn't, the Plant has the defender ability...
kitsunewarlock
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (5 votes)
While its a strong-ish wall, it should have cost only 1G or 2G by today's standards. Compare with Leatherback Baloth for some lulz. And yes, I know years and colors don't make it a fair comparison.
themlsna
★★★★☆ (4.1/5.0) (5 votes)
Any way you look at it, it's a wall with 4 power.
MichaelSG
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (5 votes)
There's nothing spectacular about this card, its quite ordinary, but I love it for the sheer hilarity of the art work and the concept. Its like something from the movie Jumanji.
Gabriel422
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (4 votes)
Hey, it's got no defender on the card! Now it's decent.
Goatllama
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Okay, I just clicked random card and went from a newer version of Carnivorous Plant to....... Carnivorous plant. I think it's hungry.
JimT70
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
Great old school card. At a time when Dark and Arabian were the only sets boosting 4th, this was a strong defensive player.
gasimakos1
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)
Type your comment here.
shotoku64
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0) (1 vote)
I read this as Carnivorous Plane at first and was like "F*** YEAH HOW COOL IS THAT, SCREW IT ELDRAZI" then slowly grew more depressed
Burningsickle
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
nice flavor, but it seems simply too weak to have much use in most decks.