better than Psychic Overload but costed higher accordingly. This is ok i guess. I would rather just have Dehydrationand risk the artifact or Psychic Overload and get Card advantage or at least a 1 for 1.
kuzimu
★★★★☆ (4.1/5.0)(8 votes)
Couldn't you almost take control of your opponent's creature for 5?
OutlawD1
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(6 votes)
lol, wizards what was the guy coming up with the mana cost smoking? I want some
I like these cards BUT IT COSTS SO MUCH it makes me sad
Kirbster
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(10 votes)
It would be better if it didn't cost all the manas.
blink182zombies
★★★★☆ (4.1/5.0)(5 votes)
The lowest rated non-creature blue card. . . lol
Dolorosa
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0)(2 votes)
You could simply Doom Blade something, but that's SOOO main stream. You could use Day of Judgement, but you don't want YOUR things to die, do you? You could maybe use Persuasion to simply take it the creature for yourself, but do you want that filthy thing in your house? Certainly not!
The solution? An extremely convuluted and mana expensive, ahem, "removal" that uses mana that could have been spent on, say, ANYTHING ELSE! Such as Unsummon, making your opponent pay for it again. But if you're running this card, chances are you see absolutely no problems with whittling all your mana and can't understand how that's a bad thing.
vantha
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Once again this card demonstrates that White is color of Pacifism effects and Blue has to pay 2-3 more mana to do that exact same thing. The color pie tries to allocate abilities to each color but I dont see why Blue can't have Pacifism for 3 mana instead of paying 5 like this piece of turd.
Aquillion
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Waaaaay too expensive. One of the lowest-rated blue cards ever printed for a reason.
FourEx
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
for WUBRG i could play cromax or i could play this
THE CHOICE IS OBVIOUS!!!!
Nivean_Dauphin
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Um, this is a horrible card for dealing with creatures. This is undeniable. What you are ignoring is it also works on artifacts. This is why it costs more than pacifism effects, in blue or white, because it can shut down an artifact, which those other cards can't, and in blue, which has little enough to deal with artifacts at all.
"I know! Let's remove the cantrip, lower the mana cost by 1, and make it able to enchant artifacts!"
"Brilliant! I can't wait to see the players' jaws drop when they see this one!"
SeriouslyFacetious
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
To me, this card represents a test of your inner Vorthos. Great name, useful ability, cool art, insightful flavour text, useless card.
It breaks my heart that a card that had so much thought put into it is damned forever to the bottom of the draft pick. But that's how life is, right... There can't be first place without last...
Comments (14)
The solution? An extremely convuluted and mana expensive, ahem, "removal" that uses mana that could have been spent on, say, ANYTHING ELSE! Such as Unsummon, making your opponent pay for it again. But if you're running this card, chances are you see absolutely no problems with whittling all your mana and can't understand how that's a bad thing.
THE CHOICE IS OBVIOUS!!!!
"Agreed. How can we make it better?"
"I know! Let's remove the cantrip, lower the mana cost by 1, and make it able to enchant artifacts!"
"Brilliant! I can't wait to see the players' jaws drop when they see this one!"
It breaks my heart that a card that had so much thought put into it is damned forever to the bottom of the draft pick. But that's how life is, right... There can't be first place without last...