Only him and 1 other Satyr in the game. Why hasn't WotC made more Satyrs? It's an interesting bit of flavor to return to, and Fauns could be included in the Satyr type, widening it to increase the options.
Kryptnyt
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
lol! edh player.
Kirbster
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Try him in EDH.
land_comment
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
I like playing this against a Sliver Overlord EDH deck and watch my opponents cry.
Salient
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
I like the "if the game ends" clause on the original printing. "You do not get to go home with their card."
Aquillion
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
@Salient: Well, this was before they'd abandoned ante, so it was an understandable concern, especially since there actually were some cards printed that would give you real-world ownership of the other person's cards (eg Tempest Efreet, Bronze Tablet.)
The distinction between "owns" and "controls" has always been somewhat confusing to new players; and when this card was printed, there were actually other cards that said "you become the owner of card X" and meant it.
Rancid_Raptor
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
One of the few creatures that could be reprinted in Theros and make sense still. UNless its on the reserved list or something.
Comments (8)
The distinction between "owns" and "controls" has always been somewhat confusing to new players; and when this card was printed, there were actually other cards that said "you become the owner of card X" and meant it.
Bugger.