angry_monk 2008-11-26 ★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (4 votes) 2 mana for a 2/2 that can be given flying for an extra mana?Yea that's pretty good.
Richard_Hawk 2010-09-14 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote) This card is better than it appears. A 3 mana 2/2 flying isn't bad at all, and this could be a force to play against in a tribal deck.
channelblaze 2010-11-13 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes) A cricket knight flying on a llama? 5 stars from me!
Vishlord 2011-02-03 ★★★☆☆ (3.7/5.0) (3 votes) Is he really any better than a storm crow? He can't fly in defence and his ability requires mana... although he does have a more useful creature type
Ideatog 2011-07-17 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes) What I want to know is why it had to only function while attacking. Similar Goblin and Merfolk cards can pay the extra mana to fly whenever they want.
The-Earth-Dragon 2012-04-20 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote) Knights have the Leonin to cover the sky, but you may be able to use this for Kithkin.
Mode 2013-05-12 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Am i the only one that thinks of this as an Unhinged card for the fraction of a second upon seeing name and artwork?
Comments (10)
Yea that's pretty good.
Especially the flying variety.