Think of forestwalk as being an extra. This is actually quite good. If you put it in a Red deck, then it could be a 3/4 min every time you attack. Who cares about forestwalk? But forestwalk would be an extra against decks with forests. ALSO, it's got a toughness of 3, which is the normal toughness (if not more) of a 3 to cast creature. It's also a common and pretty cheap to get.
Kryptnyt
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
also, Goblin/warrior/shaman are all relevant creature types.
Test-Subject_217601
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I'd rather he gain trample when I cast a green spell.
OmegaSerris
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I really didn't like the Duo cycle. They just seemed too random to be helpful. They also encouraged you to over extend, which is never a good thing unless the win is a sure thing.
DoragonShinzui
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
2/3 for 3 is good. All of the abilities are handy.
Fearsomecritter
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This is the duo I like the most, the base stats are good to begin with and in a deck with any amount of cheap burn these guys do pretty well.
Comments (6)
This is actually quite good.
If you put it in a Red deck, then it could be a 3/4 min every time you attack. Who cares about forestwalk? But forestwalk would be an extra against decks with forests.
ALSO, it's got a toughness of 3, which is the normal toughness (if not more) of a 3 to cast creature.
It's also a common and pretty cheap to get.