The casting cost is too high. But Mark Tedin did an awesome artwork job here.
Guest57443454
★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0)(5 votes)
Agreed, it also has excellent flavor text...
Auteur
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(3 votes)
For a name like this, I'd expect some terrifyingly huge creature with a corresponding drawback. Instead... regeneration?
SleetFox
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0)(1 vote)
This card is just despicable. Cost BB or something instead of sacrificing a Swamp and it's pretty good, though still off-flavor.
storm_crow4presidnt
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0)(1 vote)
This would make for a wicked tattoo other then that pretty horribad
Kirbster
★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0)(7 votes)
How delightfully Lovecraftian.
Detonativity
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I love this card. I mean, I know it's a complete piece of garbage, but that art may just be one of my favorites from Legends.
ROBRAM89
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Less Lovecraft and more Giger. But yes, this art is pretty well wasted.
Crag-Hack
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Should have been a 13/13 for 13 with some insane 13-related ability. Oh well, a lost opportunity i suppose :\
DarthParallax
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
the art, name, and mechanics should all be taken apart and given to different art, name, and mechanics. this doesn't look nearly big enough to be a Horror of Horrors, unless you make it a HORRIBLY Spike Effect that just plain Castrates Target Player and feeds their balls to them. :P
DoragonShinzui
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Yup. Pretty horrible.
*Ba dum, tish*
Equinox523
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This could potentially be handy at a fraction of the price, but as it is, it's just an expensive way to protect your black investments with excess swamps in the lategame. A pity because that is some fantastic artwork from Mark Tedin!
Comments (12)
But Mark Tedin did an awesome artwork job here.
*Ba dum, tish*