Paying four for a 2/2 isn't worth, even if it does have graft and regenerate abilities. Now if the activated regenerate ability had cost , then it would be far more functional.
Alqatrkapa
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(3 votes)
Contrary to SavageBrain89, this card worked out well in my Simic Mutology deck. (Dissension) Although the cost was a bit mana-heavy, it was really effective.
RazzmatazzTheGreat
★★★★☆ (4.4/5.0)(6 votes)
This has the honor of being my first card ever. May not be all too useful, but will always be a personal favorite of mine just cause of the memories. And badass art.
TPmanW
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0)(3 votes)
Works pretty good ion casual allies.
dark_hero
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(2 votes)
This art deserves a better card. I think it would've been awesome with 1 less cmc for the card or the ability.
BuffJittePLZ
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(3 votes)
I do not see why everyone thinks this card should have been stronger. It has a functional use and is at the common rarity level, it is fine as it is, a 3 to 3.5 on 5 is a normal card, and in graft and draft works nicely.
metalevolence
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(3 votes)
Nerfed so as not to horribly clog limited boards as often.
Still probably could have got another point of toughness or something.
NoobOfLore
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0)(1 vote)
Sweet art, and a solid ability. I really like this card.
imsully2
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0)(3 votes)
This card can be extremely useful in a Ghave deck or in a deck dased around either Mikaeus because it reads, "all creatures you control have {1}{G} Regenerate this creature
DoragonShinzui
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(3 votes)
By itself, a bit underwhelming. But let me ask you this: In a Simic deck, how often do your creatures actually stay their size? Yeah, that's what I thought.
Comments (10)
Still probably could have got another point of toughness or something.
I really like this card.