Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Primal Clay

Multiverse ID: 1017

Primal Clay

Comments (9)

Guest57443454
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (4 votes)
This a nice card, right on the then-current power level...It's an interesting option for deck builders to use...
Tiggurix
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Indeed it is, and I love the artwork of this version!
MagicMTG
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (6 votes)
Hawt.
Lateralis0ne
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (4 votes)
I'm not sure if I like this version or its counterpart Primal Plasma more...
aznxknightz
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
I don't care how strong or weak it is, i'll take the left one.
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (3 votes)
The power of the boobs of clay compels you...

It's actually not bad. It's versatile, and was a bit above the curve back then as it does not require colored mana to cast.
Radagast
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
This card isn't that powerful, but it does offer a bunch of options, which was unusual for the time.
Jerec_Onyx
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
...and I said, "That one on the left is the chick from Gaseous Form." So I checked it out and thought, "Same last name and artwork...coincidence?" So I looked up Phil. The two are married and Phil's major work is a porn comic, likely no better drawn than this artwork. Check this guy out http://www.scifiinc.net/scifiinc/gallery/bio/Foglio,_Kaja_and_Phil.htm

Right? Poor artwork, poor in constructed, poor artist married to Phil, this card is a solid 3/5.
TheVizier
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@Jerec_Onyx: You do realize Phil (and his wife Kaja) have much more work under the belt than just XXXenophile? Regardless of the card's artwork or playability, calling Kaja "poor" simply because she's married to a porn artist is simply not cricket.